Share

Ending a run is when Daniel Eatock feels most grounded in the world around him. When he’s laced up his trainers and slipped out of the city to run along the River Lea, through Hackney Marshes. 

Past the parakeets and swans and teeming wildlife. One foot in the city he feels most at home in, and one in the nature he so loves. “I like to live a life where I’m very attuned and alert and sensitive to my environment,” he explains.

“I like to live a life where I’m very attuned and alert and sensitive to my environment.”

Running along a waterway every morning is vital to Eatock’s artistic practice, he says, because it is how he sees his own way of working: “My life is about flowing like water; one thing leading to the next and the next…I often don’t have a plan. I will begin something and allow that process to flow, and something will emerge.”

Click image to enlarge
Above: A selection of Eatock's paintings. 


Eatock is a director and conceptual artist, but even those two broad-sweeping titles don’t do the breadth of his work justice. He paints; beautiful imagery in all the world’s colours. He’s built businesses and created TV idents, most notably for Big Brother, published a book and created a free CMS. He says of his practice, “I [use] the world and the problems in the world and my observational skills to make work.”

[Eatock is] an artist without limits, boundaries or dogma, he pushes against the need to define himself, speaking clearly about his desire to engage both head and heart in his work.

While he studied graphic design at the Royal College of Art, he’s never actually felt like a graphic designer. “I identify as an artist”, he says. “I was more interested in applying those things [I learnt] outside of a typical design context.” An artist without limits, boundaries or dogma, he pushes against the need to define himself, speaking clearly about his desire to engage both head and heart in his work. And in this case, by work he means life. Because he doesn’t distinguish between the two states, and nor does he between the home and studio space he occupies.

For Daniel Eatock, life = work and studio = home. “I don’t relax. I like to go to sleep or I like to be very awake. But I don’t like the in between,” he explains.

Participation > collaboration

Often artists can be positioned as solitary beings, focused entirely on their output, blind to the whims of others around them. This cannot be said of Eatock, who embraces collaboration with open arms, centring it in both his life and work, particularly with his commercial clients. As he explains: “I see clients as a way of collaborating. Rather than feeling that there are restrictions imposed on my creativity, I feel as though a client will bring their needs and I bring my needs and then we take that and explore how these two things can work together… by the collaboration, we arrive at something that’s unique and specific to that relationship.”

When asked, Eatock says that he feels he champions ‘participation’ more than he does ‘collaboration’ because he believes that an ideation process can never actually start with a collaborative act. The first spark is not collaborative; it has to come from one brain alone. But, “once begun, then it can be added to”, and the shared building begins.

For Eatock, there is no state in which he isn’t collaborating, except when asleep. He says he is constantly collaborating with the world, whose problems he’s determined to solve, and with the air he breathes and food he eats: “You’re collaborating all the time or never.

Above: Eatock at work in his studio.


Art is the most generous act

Arguably, Eatock’s greatest act of participation has been the publication of his book I Invite You To, in 2025 by Corraini Edizioni, which called on readers to create in whatever way they liked. Whether through paint or song, film or photography, it contained a series of 100 invitations - ranging from the literal to metaphorical to absurd - to the receiver of his work, in this case the book, to offer something of their own creation to the world.

“Creativity, or art-making, it’s one of the most generous acts."

Because Eatock believes that “creativity, or art-making, it’s one of the most generous acts", for art to exist in the first place, he explains, it has to be shared: “[My work] requires the viewer to activate it by engaging with it.” He says his work has to have an audience to witness it, to receive it. Whether that’s the viewers of Big Brother or those who wander into his studio to see ongoing projects including Rolling Pin Paintings, made with the ubiquitous kitchen tool and Felt Tip Prints, where the pen rests still and the paper absorbs the ink, forming the drawing.

It’s why in 2006, he co-founded Index Exhibit, a free and open source CMS that combines good functionality and usability to foreground content over complicated design. It feels typical of Eatock that his artistic output in this case is so acutely aligned to his own ethos of always working to help those around him.

Click image to enlarge
Above: Images from Eatock's book, I Invite You To.


Play is feeling lost in your own actions

Eatock doesn’t believe he has a specialism - “I’m a specialist generalist” - and that is what makes his work as an artist all the more engaging. “I don’t want to be defined by one type of work.” He’s not lost in the principles or tradition of any form but instead is embracing the innovation that only comes through feeling truly free, creatively. He points to living in Hackney for the last twenty years as contributing to that. It is the place, he says, that he feels at home, free from judgment. That freedom is crucial to his ability to create; to play. “I’m very curious as a person,” he explains. “I want to play and explore variety.”

“I’m very curious as a person. I want to play and explore variety.”

The Oxford English Dictionary definition of the word ‘play’ is ‘to engage in activity for enjoyment and recreation rather than a serious or practical purpose’. For Eatock, play is, as demonstrated by his output, always a mixture of the two. Play, for him, is about getting lost in his own actions and in the process. He points to the example of children playing an imaginary game; there will always be made-up but essential rules for that game and they will be largely unspoken, understood solely by the group of children playing that game.

This is how Eatock views his own work. He invents a set of rules, “some kind of invented logic”, for each project that, while they might not be visible in or important to the final product, are a vital part of that product’s creation. And with each piece he creates, he is always of course inviting the receiver to engage in a playful way.

Above: Eatock working on his Rolling Pin Painting.


Art you can’t put your finger on

Eatock believes that “creativity delights in the unpredictable”. People are unpredictable, which is one of the more brilliant things about them. “I don’t want to repeat what’s been done but find something relevant and new for each context,” he says. When asked the inevitable question about AI and its impact on the creative industries, Eatock is simultaneously succinct and explorative with his response: “AI should be very worried about… anyone who’s a strong creative thinker,” he says with a wry smile. “AI will never know how good a grapefruit tastes at 6am in the morning, or the delight of looking at a person you love and them looking back at you, seeing those small changes, it’s brilliant. It’s only you that can feel it.”

“The best art is the thing that feels extremely right, but you also can’t put your finger on it.”

Because, as Eatock explains, “the best art is the thing that feels extremely right but you also can’t put your finger on it.” When a human creates a piece of work, they can’t help but put their experiences into it. This, Eatock feels, is vital to the way that work is then received by an individual who can then “access it in a deep way.”

That is the belief at the heart of everything Eatock does. That a viewer, a reader, a participator should always be able to access and enjoy his work, however they choose to consume it. So, now the final questions remain. Were you paying attention as you consumed this piece of art? How many words is the article you’ve just read? Were there any spelling mistakes? And, crucially, would you read it again?

Because this article is just one artist’s version of the truth. There is also a version interpreted by this writer as participator. And the version of the truth each of you reads will be another. Still another will present itself if you don’t finish at this article’s end, but instead return to the start.

Share